Handwritten letter from Hermann Bahr to Schenker, dated July 4, 1895 [Letterhead:] „Die Zeit" [/] Wiener Wochenschrift [/] [etc.] Wien, den 4. Juli 1895 Geehrter Herr Dr! Natürlich kann der Aufsatz über „musikalische Routine"1, wenn Sie es wünschen, auch durch zwei Nummern laufen, obwohl das immer allerhand misliches2 hat. Hochachtungsvollst ergebenst Herrn Dr Heinrich Schenker © IPR under investigation |
Handwritten letter from Hermann Bahr to Schenker, dated July 4, 1895 [Letterhead:] „Die Zeit" [/] Wiener Wochenschrift [/] [etc.] Vienna, July 4, 1895 Dear Dr, [Schenker], The article on "Routine in Music"1 can naturally be serialized over two issues, if you wish, although that always carries various disadvantages2. Yours truly, Dr. Heinrich Schenker, © Translation Geoffrey A. Chew, 2006. |
COMMENTARY: FOOTNOTES: 1 Marginal annotation to this in another hand, illegible in copy. This probably concerns an earlier recension of Schenker's article "Routine in der Musik," Neue Revue, 7/45 (November 4,1896), pp. 555-58, transcr. Hellmut Federhofer, Heinrich Schenker als Essayist und Kritiker ..., (Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1990), pp.205-09. 2 "Allerhand misliches [recte: mißliches] hat": the word "mißliches" in the sense of "disadvantageous". SUMMARY: © Commentary, Footnotes, Summary Martin Eybl, 2006
|
|